Skip to main content
News

Kutrashev distorts history

Shaffafiya 2025-11-06


Russian Ambassador to Iraq, Elbrus Kutrashev, in an interview with Al-Sharqiyah television, promotes
propaganda narratives that blame the West for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. To justify this
aggression, Kutrashev distorts history, claiming that it was the West that instigated World War II,
whereas the responsibility lay with both Hitler and Stalin, as confirmed by the Ribbentrop-Molotov
Pact.

Kutrashev’s False Claims:

→ “The West planned World War II.”
Reality: It was Hitler and Stalin who led to World War II by signing one of the most treacherous
international agreements, the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact, on August 23, 1939.

→ “The same countries [that caused World War II] have now planned a war against Russia.”
Reality: Neo-imperialist and neo-colonial Russia invaded Ukraine because it does not respect the
sovereignty of other countries and consistently seeks to expand both its territory and influence.

→ “Poland and the Baltic countries are non-sovereign and follow the will of the USA.”
Reality: Poland and the Baltic states—following Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea, invasion of
Ukraine, and numerous threats—have legitimate grounds for concern and an assertive stance
towards Russia.

Learn history as it truly is. Don’t let yourself be manipulated!

Public task financed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland under the competition “Public Diplomacy 2024-2025 – European dimension and counter-disinformation.”

The publication expresses only the views of the author and cannot be identified with the official position of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland.

You May Also Like

Egypt as an Arena of Information Operations – Analysis of Contemporary Influence StrategiesCultureEducationPoliticsSecurityTechnology

Egypt as an Arena of Information Operations – Analysis of Contemporary Influence Strategies

ShaffafiyaShaffafiya2025-12-15
Disinformation about NATO’s Intervention in Belarus and “Defending Ukraine from Poland” – Elements of Russia’s Coherent Propaganda StrategyCultureEducationPoliticsSecurityTechnology

Disinformation about NATO’s Intervention in Belarus and “Defending Ukraine from Poland” – Elements of Russia’s Coherent Propaganda Strategy

ShaffafiyaShaffafiya2025-12-15
In Jordan’s media environment, the war in Iran is not presented as a distant geopolitical event. It is framed as a development with direct implications for national security, economic stability, and regional balance. This shift is not accidental. It reflects the interaction between the structure of the local media ecosystem and the strategic activity of external actors seeking to shape perception rather than simply transmit information. The key dynamic is not the promotion of a single narrative, but the gradual construction of an interpretive environment in which audiences are guided toward specific conclusions about responsibility, risk, and trust. The Media Ecosystem as a Vector of Influence Jordan’s media landscape operates through a functional balance. Official sources and mainstream outlets emphasize stability, procedural clarity, and institutional authority. At the same time, fast-moving digital platforms and social media accelerate the circulation of information and amplify emotional engagement. External actors do not attempt to replace this system. Instead, they integrate into it. Institutional messaging is reinforced by emotionally charged content, while fast-paced reporting creates opportunities for selective amplification. Newswire-style content, in particular, enables rapid secondary dissemination, often detached from its original context. As a result, audiences experience an apparent plurality of sources, while in reality operating within a constrained field of interpretation. The Russian Model of Information Influence Russian activity in the region is not based on overt propaganda, but on a layered communication strategy. At the institutional level, messaging is framed in the language of international law, sovereignty, and stability. Russia positions itself as a rational diplomatic actor advocating de-escalation and political solutions. At the media level, outlets such as RT Arabic and Sputnik Arabic adapt this framework to mass audiences. They emphasize divisions within the West, highlight uncertainty in decision-making processes, and foreground the economic and security costs for the region. At the agency level, content distributed through newswire formats achieves high penetrability. Some of these messages introduce ambiguity or unverified elements, increasing informational friction and uncertainty. This structure does not impose a single narrative. It creates an ecosystem in which interpretation is guided rather than dictated. Strategic Objectives The primary objective is not to align Jordan or the broader region with a specific geopolitical bloc. The goals are more indirect and cumulative. First, to reinforce the perception that the conflict is “someone else’s war,” while its consequences are borne by regional actors. This framing encourages caution and strategic distance. Second, to weaken trust in the West as a coherent and reliable partner by highlighting divergences in policy and intent. Third, to position Russia as an alternative diplomatic actor capable of understanding regional realities and acting pragmatically. Fourth, to anchor the conflict in economic and energy-related concerns, making it more tangible and relevant to everyday life. Why These Narratives Resonate The effectiveness of these narratives lies in their alignment with existing sensitivities. In Jordan, internal stability, economic security, and avoidance of external entanglements are central concerns. Messages framed around sovereignty, cost, and regional risk do not appear foreign. They resonate with established patterns of perception. Repetition across multiple platforms further reinforces credibility, even when the underlying sources are interconnected. How to Respond The first step is to distinguish between information and interpretation. Not all analysis is neutral; some content is designed to guide conclusions rather than explain events. The second is source verification. The presence of identical information across multiple outlets does not necessarily indicate independent confirmation. The third is awareness of emotional triggers. Content that provokes fear, urgency, or anger is often structured to maximize reach rather than accuracy. The fourth is maintaining trust in credible sources while applying consistent critical evaluation. Conclusion Jordan’s media ecosystem is not a passive recipient of external influence. It is an active environment in which narratives interact, compete, and reinforce one another. External actors, including Russia, operate within this system, adapting their messaging to local dynamics and sensitivities. Understanding these mechanisms does not require rejecting external information. It requires recognizing that information can function as an instrument of influence, shaping perception as much as it reflects reality.
How External Actors Use Jordan’s Media Ecosystem: Mechanisms, Objectives, and ResponsesIranJordanPoliticsSecurity

How External Actors Use Jordan’s Media Ecosystem: Mechanisms, Objectives, and Responses

ShaffafiyaShaffafiya2026-04-02
Share