Skip to main content

The Russian Federation employs complex disinformation techniques to influence public opinion, particularly in Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) countries. One example of such disinformation is the manipulation of images showing Jews traveling to Uman, Ukraine, where annual Rosh Hashanah (Jewish New Year) celebrations are held. Images of the Hasidic pilgrimage have been used by pro-Russian propaganda centers to fabricate a narrative about an alleged “mass immigration of Jews through Poland to Ukraine” and the construction of a “new Ukraine” as a “Jewish state” under the protection of President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Kremlin Hypocrisy: “Nazi” Ukraine and “Jewish Colonization”

Russia’s use of anti-Semitism as a propaganda tool has a long history, as detailed in the article “Anti-Semitism in Russia” (https://infoops.pl/antysemityzm-w-rosji/) and confirmed in this year’s U.S. State Department report (https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/GEC-Special-Report-More-than-a-Century-of-Antisemitism.pdf). On one hand, the Kremlin and pro-Russian media consistently portray Ukraine as a state supposedly overrun by Nazis, anti-Semites, and Russophobes, invoking emotionally charged rhetoric about “denazification” of Ukraine as a goal of the Russian invasion. In this narrative, Zelensky – who is of Jewish descent – is hypocritically depicted as a leader supporting anti-Semitic groups. On the other hand, Russian propaganda employs a completely different tactic by portraying Zelensky as a Jew who allegedly opens Ukraine to mass Jewish immigration, suggesting that they are “colonizing” the country to establish a new Jewish state. This version of disinformation finds particular use in Arab countries, where anti-Semitism is sometimes rooted in certain segments of society. Pro-Russian channels and social media, often with fake accounts or bots, spread images of Uman pilgrims as “evidence” of this false narrative.

Objective of Disinformation

This kind of dual disinformation strategy aims to:

  • Heighten anti-Semitic and anti-Ukrainian sentiment – It seeks to instill suspicion toward Ukraine in MENA countries, discouraging them from providing diplomatic and material support for Ukraine.
  • Defame the opposition – Russian propaganda not only manipulates public opinion abroad but also strives to silence internal opposition. An analysis by the Israeli think tank associated with Bar-Ilan University, Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, titled “The Russian-Speaking Jewish Diaspora and the War in Ukraine,” notes that in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus – collectively home to around 90% of Jews living in former Soviet states – authorities in these three countries demanded unequivocal support for their policies in the face of the war in Ukraine. This support was expected not only from Jews as individual citizens but also from Jewish organizations in these countries (https://besacenter.org/the-russian-speaking-jewish-diaspora-and-the-war-in-ukraine/). Jewish responses to these expectations varied. While Ukrainian Jews, both personally and organizationally, are nearly unanimous in their support for their country’s leadership in its war and humanitarian efforts, not all Jews in Russia and Belarus have the courage to oppose the official narrative, according to the report’s authors. Therefore, it can be inferred that the Kremlin’s propagandistic actions described in both cited analyses, such as spreading anti-Semitic stereotypes and conspiracy theories, may create an atmosphere of fear and uncertainty among Russian Jews, which may be perceived as a form of intimidation.

Additionally, the intensification of repression against the opposition and civil society in Russia following the invasion of Ukraine, as noted in the BESA Center analysis, may also impact the sense of security among Russian Jews, even if they are not directly targeted by these actions.

  • Strengthening conspiracy theories – Russia exploits existing conspiracy theories about Jewish “control of the world” and adapts them to current events to reinforce its messaging. Similar narratives were used during the tsarist and Soviet eras, such as the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” – a fabricated document that served to justify anti-Semitism and fear of a Jewish “conspiracy.”

Impact on MENA Communities

Pro-Russian messages in the MENA region are intentionally manipulated to exploit existing hostilities and prejudices. In Arab countries, disinformation about “Jewish colonization of Ukraine” may find fertile ground and strengthen anti-Western and anti-Israeli sentiments. This disinformation serves to inflame emotions and divisions, which Russia can exploit to weaken international solidarity with Ukraine.

Summary

The Kremlin’s propaganda surrounding the alleged “Jewish colonization of Ukraine” exemplifies an advanced disinformation strategy that uses anti-Semitism, lies, and manipulation to achieve political goals. This approach seeks both to undermine the credibility of Ukraine and Zelensky and to silence internal opposition to the war. By using double standards and manipulating historical biases, the Kremlin aims to create confusion and destabilization on the international stage, diverting attention from its own aggressive actions.


Author: Wojciech Pokora – INFO OPS Poland Foundation


Inflating the Role: From a Maritime Passage to a Tool in Information Conflict Bab el-Mandab has long remained one of the most important points in global trade routes. However, in recent times, its role has been presented in a clearly exaggerated manner, as evidence of the fragility of the global economic system. This shift in the way reality is portrayed cannot be separated from the growing activity in the field of information operations targeting the region. Reframing Risk: A Designed, Not Spontaneous Narrative In these materials, the issue is not limited to reporting risks related to maritime security. Rather, these risks are being used to construct a broader narrative about the collapse of the global system. This pattern aligns with well-established lines of messaging in Russian media campaigns, which for years have sought to portray globalization as a weak and unsustainable system. The mechanism here is clear: the use of real facts, but linking them to pre-determined conclusions. In this way, analysis is transformed into a tool of influence. Shifting the Evaluation Framework: From Stability to the Logic of Power In the Red Sea context, attacks and disruptions are not presented as threats to stability, but as evidence of the effectiveness of certain actors. This shift serves a broader narrative promoted by media outlets linked to Russia, where power and the ability to disrupt are presented as alternatives to concepts such as stability and cooperation. The result is a redefinition of what is considered “success” in the eyes of the audience. Undermining Trust: Targeting the Image of the West A central element of this discourse is the portrayal of the United States and its allies as actors incapable of controlling the situation. This pattern is systematically repeated across media platforms linked to Russia and aims to weaken trust in existing security structures, particularly in regions that Moscow considers areas of strategic competition. Language of Crisis: A Tool of Psychological Influence The language used in these materials suggests that the crisis is inevitable and that the global system is approaching its end. This approach is not incidental, but part of psychological influence techniques that rely on amplifying risk to generate a sense of uncertainty. At the same time, key factors such as the ability of markets to adapt or the existence of logistical alternatives are ignored, resulting in an incomplete picture of reality. How the Operation Works: Between Analysis and Direction The strength of this narrative lies in the fact that it does not appear as direct propaganda. Instead, it is presented as a logical, data-driven analysis. This method is widely used in Russian information operations, as it allows influence over both elites and the broader public without triggering direct resistance. The audience does not feel that it is being guided, yet in reality it is operating within a framework that has been pre-defined. Conclusion: Bab el-Mandab as a Tool of Influence, Not Proof of Collapse Bab el-Mandab is not the cause of the weakness of the global system, but it has become a tool used in information conflict to portray that system as collapsing. Understanding this distinction is essential, because the risk lies not only in events on the ground, but in the way they are interpreted and presented.
Bab el-Mandab as a Theater of Russian Influence Operations: How the Narrative of the “Collapse of Globalization” Is ConstructedIranNewsSecurity

Bab el-Mandab as a Theater of Russian Influence Operations: How the Narrative of the “Collapse of Globalization” Is Constructed

ShaffafiyaShaffafiya2026-04-08
Kutrashev misleads the Iraqi people – Another example of propaganda from Russia’s ambassador to Iraq.CultureEducationPoliticsSecurityTechnology

Kutrashev misleads the Iraqi people – Another example of propaganda from Russia’s ambassador to Iraq.

ShaffafiyaShaffafiya2025-12-15
Secondary Disinformation: How Russia Exploits the 2022 Gas Supply Cutoff in Ongoing PropagandaCultureEducationPoliticsSecurityTechnology

Secondary Disinformation: How Russia Exploits the 2022 Gas Supply Cutoff in Ongoing Propaganda

ShaffafiyaShaffafiya2025-12-15