Skip to main content

The Russian Federation employs complex disinformation techniques to influence public opinion, particularly in Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) countries. One example of such disinformation is the manipulation of images showing Jews traveling to Uman, Ukraine, where annual Rosh Hashanah (Jewish New Year) celebrations are held. Images of the Hasidic pilgrimage have been used by pro-Russian propaganda centers to fabricate a narrative about an alleged “mass immigration of Jews through Poland to Ukraine” and the construction of a “new Ukraine” as a “Jewish state” under the protection of President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Kremlin Hypocrisy: “Nazi” Ukraine and “Jewish Colonization”

Russia’s use of anti-Semitism as a propaganda tool has a long history, as detailed in the article “Anti-Semitism in Russia” (https://infoops.pl/antysemityzm-w-rosji/) and confirmed in this year’s U.S. State Department report (https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/GEC-Special-Report-More-than-a-Century-of-Antisemitism.pdf). On one hand, the Kremlin and pro-Russian media consistently portray Ukraine as a state supposedly overrun by Nazis, anti-Semites, and Russophobes, invoking emotionally charged rhetoric about “denazification” of Ukraine as a goal of the Russian invasion. In this narrative, Zelensky – who is of Jewish descent – is hypocritically depicted as a leader supporting anti-Semitic groups. On the other hand, Russian propaganda employs a completely different tactic by portraying Zelensky as a Jew who allegedly opens Ukraine to mass Jewish immigration, suggesting that they are “colonizing” the country to establish a new Jewish state. This version of disinformation finds particular use in Arab countries, where anti-Semitism is sometimes rooted in certain segments of society. Pro-Russian channels and social media, often with fake accounts or bots, spread images of Uman pilgrims as “evidence” of this false narrative.

Objective of Disinformation

This kind of dual disinformation strategy aims to:

  • Heighten anti-Semitic and anti-Ukrainian sentiment – It seeks to instill suspicion toward Ukraine in MENA countries, discouraging them from providing diplomatic and material support for Ukraine.
  • Defame the opposition – Russian propaganda not only manipulates public opinion abroad but also strives to silence internal opposition. An analysis by the Israeli think tank associated with Bar-Ilan University, Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, titled “The Russian-Speaking Jewish Diaspora and the War in Ukraine,” notes that in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus – collectively home to around 90% of Jews living in former Soviet states – authorities in these three countries demanded unequivocal support for their policies in the face of the war in Ukraine. This support was expected not only from Jews as individual citizens but also from Jewish organizations in these countries (https://besacenter.org/the-russian-speaking-jewish-diaspora-and-the-war-in-ukraine/). Jewish responses to these expectations varied. While Ukrainian Jews, both personally and organizationally, are nearly unanimous in their support for their country’s leadership in its war and humanitarian efforts, not all Jews in Russia and Belarus have the courage to oppose the official narrative, according to the report’s authors. Therefore, it can be inferred that the Kremlin’s propagandistic actions described in both cited analyses, such as spreading anti-Semitic stereotypes and conspiracy theories, may create an atmosphere of fear and uncertainty among Russian Jews, which may be perceived as a form of intimidation.

Additionally, the intensification of repression against the opposition and civil society in Russia following the invasion of Ukraine, as noted in the BESA Center analysis, may also impact the sense of security among Russian Jews, even if they are not directly targeted by these actions.

  • Strengthening conspiracy theories – Russia exploits existing conspiracy theories about Jewish “control of the world” and adapts them to current events to reinforce its messaging. Similar narratives were used during the tsarist and Soviet eras, such as the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” – a fabricated document that served to justify anti-Semitism and fear of a Jewish “conspiracy.”

Impact on MENA Communities

Pro-Russian messages in the MENA region are intentionally manipulated to exploit existing hostilities and prejudices. In Arab countries, disinformation about “Jewish colonization of Ukraine” may find fertile ground and strengthen anti-Western and anti-Israeli sentiments. This disinformation serves to inflame emotions and divisions, which Russia can exploit to weaken international solidarity with Ukraine.

Summary

The Kremlin’s propaganda surrounding the alleged “Jewish colonization of Ukraine” exemplifies an advanced disinformation strategy that uses anti-Semitism, lies, and manipulation to achieve political goals. This approach seeks both to undermine the credibility of Ukraine and Zelensky and to silence internal opposition to the war. By using double standards and manipulating historical biases, the Kremlin aims to create confusion and destabilization on the international stage, diverting attention from its own aggressive actions.


Author: Wojciech Pokora – INFO OPS Poland Foundation


Information Warfare Online: Digital Disinformation in Egypt and African CountriesChinaEgyptSecurity

Information Warfare Online: Digital Disinformation in Egypt and African Countries

ShaffafiyaShaffafiya2025-12-15
In official discourse, Russia today presents itself as a natural partner of the Global South and as a defender of a multipolar world order in opposition to what it describes as Western dominance. This narrative resonates strongly in the Arab world, as it echoes a deep political memory that goes back to the Bandung Conference of 1955, when post-colonial states, including Egypt under Gamal Abdel Nasser, sought to chart an independent path beyond the rivalry of great powers. At that time, the goal was not alignment, but precisely the opposite. As analyses published by Explaining History note, Bandung leaders declared their rejection of “colonialism in all its forms”, whether Western or Soviet. The central idea was clear: true independence meant not becoming a tool in someone else’s conflict. Today, Russia invokes the same language, but operates according to a different logic. From Partnership to Exploitation Facts on the ground reveal a different picture. In Iraq, for example, security investigations uncovered recruitment networks targeting young people. As reported by The New Arab, they were lured by offers of work or study, which later “turned into military service contracts” after arrival in Russia. The issue was not only deception, but also the structure of the process itself, where individuals were pressured to sign documents in a language they did not understand. Other sources confirm that these were not isolated cases. The National reports that young people were recruited through “seemingly legal channels such as travel agencies or employment offices”, only to find themselves bound by contracts they could not escape. The same source adds that “around 3,000 Iraqis ended up in the Russian army”. What is happening here is not cooperation between states, but the exploitation of economic and informational asymmetries. Cuba and Africa: The Same Pattern, Different Tools In Cuba, the mechanism takes a different form but follows the same logic. According to an analysis by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation, recruits were offered salaries “of up to 2,000 USD per month, compared to an average Cuban income of around 17 USD”, along with promises of property and citizenship. In such conditions, the issue is less about free choice and more about economic pressure. In Africa, the picture is more fragmented, but the underlying logic remains similar. Al Jazeera reported, citing Ukrainian sources, that “more than 1,780 African nationals are currently fighting in the Russian army”, with recruitment spanning dozens of countries. The same sources indicate that many were drawn in through “black market labor […] without proper training”, often under the pretext of civilian employment. At the individual level, the situation becomes even clearer. A Reuters report states that some recruits were sent “directly to dig trenches and engage in frontline operations”, often without adequate preparation or logistical support. Not Only War, but Also Messaging This process is not limited to military use. The presence of foreign fighters is also instrumentalized in the information domain. According to The New Voice of Ukraine, citing Ukrainian intelligence, the aim is to build a narrative that “Russia is not an aggressor because it is also supported by the ‘civilized world’”. In other words, these individuals serve not only as soldiers, but also as elements of a broader propaganda strategy. What Happened to the Spirit of Bandung? This is where the central contradiction becomes visible. The idea behind Bandung was based on independence and the refusal to be drawn into great power conflicts. What we observe today, however, reflects a different dynamic. The Soviet Union once used the rhetoric of supporting liberation movements, while simultaneously expanding its sphere of influence. Contemporary Russia employs a similar pattern. Instead of overt ideological framing, it relies more on economic incentives, intermediary networks, and information influence. The outcome, however, remains comparable. Countries of the Global South are not treated as equal partners, but as environments from which resources can be extracted, including human resources. The Real Question The issue is not what is being said, but what is actually happening on the ground. If “cooperation” means that young people from Baghdad, Havana, or African cities are sent to fight in wars that are not theirs, then the question must be asked: is this support for independence, or a new form of dependency? The key analytical distinction lies between rhetoric and practice. Official language may speak of resisting imperialism, but operational reality may reproduce it in a different form. This is where the paradox becomes evident. Under the banner of opposing “Western imperialism”, mechanisms are being deployed that follow a similar logic, even if they are framed differently.
Russia and the Global South: From Bandung to the Instrumentalization of Human ResourcesEducationEgyptIranIraqIsraelJordanLebanonNews2PoliticsSecurityTechnology

Russia and the Global South: From Bandung to the Instrumentalization of Human Resources

ShaffafiyaShaffafiya2026-04-02
Inflating the Role: From a Maritime Passage to a Tool in Information Conflict Bab el-Mandab has long remained one of the most important points in global trade routes. However, in recent times, its role has been presented in a clearly exaggerated manner, as evidence of the fragility of the global economic system. This shift in the way reality is portrayed cannot be separated from the growing activity in the field of information operations targeting the region. Reframing Risk: A Designed, Not Spontaneous Narrative In these materials, the issue is not limited to reporting risks related to maritime security. Rather, these risks are being used to construct a broader narrative about the collapse of the global system. This pattern aligns with well-established lines of messaging in Russian media campaigns, which for years have sought to portray globalization as a weak and unsustainable system. The mechanism here is clear: the use of real facts, but linking them to pre-determined conclusions. In this way, analysis is transformed into a tool of influence. Shifting the Evaluation Framework: From Stability to the Logic of Power In the Red Sea context, attacks and disruptions are not presented as threats to stability, but as evidence of the effectiveness of certain actors. This shift serves a broader narrative promoted by media outlets linked to Russia, where power and the ability to disrupt are presented as alternatives to concepts such as stability and cooperation. The result is a redefinition of what is considered “success” in the eyes of the audience. Undermining Trust: Targeting the Image of the West A central element of this discourse is the portrayal of the United States and its allies as actors incapable of controlling the situation. This pattern is systematically repeated across media platforms linked to Russia and aims to weaken trust in existing security structures, particularly in regions that Moscow considers areas of strategic competition. Language of Crisis: A Tool of Psychological Influence The language used in these materials suggests that the crisis is inevitable and that the global system is approaching its end. This approach is not incidental, but part of psychological influence techniques that rely on amplifying risk to generate a sense of uncertainty. At the same time, key factors such as the ability of markets to adapt or the existence of logistical alternatives are ignored, resulting in an incomplete picture of reality. How the Operation Works: Between Analysis and Direction The strength of this narrative lies in the fact that it does not appear as direct propaganda. Instead, it is presented as a logical, data-driven analysis. This method is widely used in Russian information operations, as it allows influence over both elites and the broader public without triggering direct resistance. The audience does not feel that it is being guided, yet in reality it is operating within a framework that has been pre-defined. Conclusion: Bab el-Mandab as a Tool of Influence, Not Proof of Collapse Bab el-Mandab is not the cause of the weakness of the global system, but it has become a tool used in information conflict to portray that system as collapsing. Understanding this distinction is essential, because the risk lies not only in events on the ground, but in the way they are interpreted and presented.
Bab el-Mandab as a Theater of Russian Influence Operations: How the Narrative of the “Collapse of Globalization” Is ConstructedIranNewsSecurity

Bab el-Mandab as a Theater of Russian Influence Operations: How the Narrative of the “Collapse of Globalization” Is Constructed

ShaffafiyaShaffafiya2026-04-08